Quite frequently I catch Daniel Schorr’s commentaries on N.P.R. when I am driving in the afternoon. I’m not a huge fan of All Things Considered, but it’s better than any other news on the radio so I listen. But invariably turn off the radio midway through Daniel Schorr’s commentary. It’s not that he pisses me off. It’s that his commentaries are so bland and devoid of opinion. What’s the point of having an editorial commentary if the opinion espoused is that N.A.T.O. struggles with finding a purpose since the fall of the Soviet Union? Duh.